Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-05-09 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2249 SB 7 Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the Senate rescind its previous action in passing CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am "An Act relating to grants for school construction, to reimbursement of school construction debt, and to school construction bonds issued by the Alaska Municipal Bond Bank Authority; and providing for an effective date." Without objection, the Senate rescinded its previous action. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am was before the Senate in third reading on reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the Senate return to second reading for the purpose of specific amendments, those being amendments currently on the Secretary's desk. Without objection, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am was returned to second reading. Senator Frank offered Amendment No. 8 : Page 1, line 1 through page 8, line 28: Delete all material and insert: The text contained in CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed) is Amendment No. 8 and will be published in Senate Supplement No. 7 at a later date. Senator Frank moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Senator Duncan objected. 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2250 SB 7 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Phillips, Salo, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 8 failed. Senator Taylor moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 8. Senator Duncan objected. The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 8?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Second Reading Rescind action in failing to adopt amendment No. 8 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2251 SB 7 Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, the Senate rescinded its previous action. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 8 was adopted. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 9 : Page 6, in the line before "* Sec. 10" After "AS 39.20.180" Insert "After being selected, a member of the committee may only be removed by the commissioner for just cause." 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2252 SB 7 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. Amendments No. 10, No. 11 and No. 12 were not offered. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 13 : Page 11, line 25: Delete "1998" Insert "1995" 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2253 SB 7 Page 14, line 11: Delete "1998" Insert "1995" Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 13. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Jacko changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 13 failed. 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2255 SB 7 Senator Adams offered Amendment No. 14 : Page 11, on the second line of sec. 16(n): After "section": Insert "may not exceed $250,000,000." Page 11, in sec. 16(n): Delete (1), (2)(A), (B), and (C) in their entirety. Page 14, in sec. 21: Delete "(1) may only be issued to fund school construction, additions to schools, or major school rehabilitation projects that are approved under AS14.07.020(a)(11); and (2) until July1, 1998, shall be allocated as follows: (A) $133,000,000 shall be allocated to projects in a municipality with a population of 200,000 or more people; (B) $67,000,000 shall be allocated to projects in a municipality with a population of at least 60,000, but less than 200,000 people; (C) $50,000,000 shall be allocated to projects in a municipality with less than 60,000 people [$300,000,000]." Insert "may only be issued to fund school construction, additions to schools, or major school rehabilitation projects that are approved under AS14.07.020(a)(11) [$300,000,000]." Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 14. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2256 SB 7 CSSB 7(FIN) AM Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 14 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 15 : Page 2, in Sec. 14.11.008(b), after the line ending "5 percent": Delete: 100,001 - 200,000 10 percent 200,001 - 600,000 30 percent Insert: 100,001 - 200,000 15 percent over 200,000 25 percent Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 15. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Second Reading Amendment No. 15 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2257 SB 7 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 15 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Duncan moved that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed) be returned to second reading for the purpose of rescinding action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 13. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed) be returned to second reading? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date Return to second YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Phillips, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the bill failed to be returned to second reading. 1993-05-09 Senate Journal Page 2258 SB 7 Senator Little moved and asked unanimous consent that her name be withdrawn as a cosponsor on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed). Without objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed) "An Act relating to school construction grants and major maintenance grants to school districts; providing for school district participation in the cost of school construction and major maintenance; creating a major maintenance grant fund; relating to reimbursement of school construction debt, and to school construction bonds issued by the Alaska Municipal Bond Bank Authority; creating an education facilities maintenance and construction fund; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 7(FIN) AM Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date YEAS: 14 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Zharoff and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed) passed the Senate. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(FIN) am(reengrossed) was referred to the Secretary for reengrossment.